Philippe Aries showed a profound interest in History, particularly in
cultural History. He is counted among the most original French
historians of the twentieth century. His main interest was focused on the study of a broader history of the culture of family
life, where he paid close attention to the parent/ child relationship. He
wrote
L'Enfant et la vie familiale sous l'Ancien Regime in 1960
where he explained that the family was a dynamic institution that had
changed throughout time and had become a smaller and more intimate unit
in a private sphere that was apart from public life. I found Aries'
argument that the idea of childhood is a recent invention fascinating.
He explains that in the Middle Ages children were shown no particular
attention in family life and that gradually, over the centuries of the
early modern era the personal development of the child came to be
nurtured which then turned the child into the center of the family's
attention. To think that a child was not always a family's center of
attention is quite strange. Aries was interested and fascinated by the
changing realities of the present age and eager to put them into
historical perspective.
How can/ does History change over time? What can influence these changes?
No comments:
Post a Comment